I'm fairly new to Spotify, and kind of like it too. I think you sort of answered your own question in a kind of round about way.
PS: I loathe the new, white, GUI on the desktop app. they need to keep up with changing ways their subscribers use their product. I hate to moan at Spotify as it's an amazingly useful product.
I'd even pay a slightly higher subscription to have such a practical solution made available to me. A dedicated Spotify Player (or an app on my Zen) for my runs would be IDEAL. Whilst it's great that I can use my Spotify Premium account on my phone for commuting to work, etc, my phone really isn't a practical size for running. Why exclude us? The more Apple-centric a company becomes. I, like many users of Spotify Premium, don't ever want to buy an Apple product. I should've checked with Creative before buying, but, hey-ho, we live and learn. I, like someone else on this forum, invested in an Android based Creative Zen Touch 2 assuming I'd be able to get the Spotify app from the Google Play Store, just as iPod users can from the App Store. How bizarre does that actually sound? A MUSIC app that is not available to me on a dedicated MUSIC device!!! I can play and/or download unlimited tracks on my TV, my laptop and my phone. So, why's it ok for me to have all the futionality of Spotify on my laptop, my TiVo, my Android phone but not a dedicated music device? To me. However, these devices aren't a practical size for running and usage kills my phone's battery longevity. I use the offline AND online funtionality as I have unlimited 4G data with my mobile contract. Why is it okay to take Spotify anwhere I go on my mobile phone but not on a music player? How is that different? I use Spotify on my Android phone, my friend on her iPod Touch. I don't understand why people are rambling on about liscencing issues or artist rights.
0 kommentar(er)
